2 ms·
for 3.5", DD have proven much more durable than HD. And notably HD were terrible at being used as DD, as is generally the case with Amiga floppies.
by snvzz 2y ago
for 3.5", DD have proven much more durable than HD.
And notably HD were terrible at being used as DD, as is generally the case with Amiga floppies.
- _the_inflator 2y agoYep, I refrained from using them. Also too expensive. With the advent of Amiga hard disk I didn’t need that much disks anymore. I bought mine - 50mb! - at the World of Commodore 1991 I think.
- aidenn0 2y agoThat makes sense; my copy of Star Trek: The Rebel Universe (DD) still works, while few of my circa 1990 Sierra floppies (HD) work.