4 ms·
I gave it some thought before replacing the title. I'm confortable with what I came up with because the new title echoes both of the article's main points, whil
by PedroCandeias 14y ago
I gave it some thought before replacing the title. I'm confortable with what I came up with because the new title echoes both of the article's main points, while the original focuses a bit too much on the "unhackable" side and is, frankly, a bit click-baity. Anyway, I'm sorry if it passed as blind apple love. Wasn't my intention.
- fjarlq 14y agoAnd the question mark fits with the conclusion of the article. Betteridge's Law of Headlines: "Any headline which ends in a question mark can be answered by the word 'no'." -- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Betteridges_Law_of_Headlines http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Betteridges_Law_of_Headlines