7 ms·
Historically, the population of the world was exposed to much higher doses of common pollutants than today in much of the world. One example, see link below. If
by southernplaces7 2y ago
Historically, the population of the world was exposed to much higher doses of common pollutants than today in much of the world. One example, see link below. If what your second line describes were so directly the case, then, for example, the people of late medieval Europe or the time of the early industrial revolution would have been saturated with diseases like cancer, alzheimers, diabetes etc. Maybe they were, since medical records from those times are barely above non-existent, never mind being clinically accurate, but the evidence either way definitely shows how much higher accumulations of common toxins were in people's bones, hair, blood etc prior to modern times.
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00204-012-0866-7 https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00204-012-0866-7
- sharpshadow 2y agoOne mayor thing which changed definitely and is underrepresented is the exposure to various frequencies.
- southernplaces7 2y agofrequencies in what sense? The entire spectrum of communications frequencies used by our comms technologies, including 5G, are well inside the non-ionizing side of the EM spectrum. There's no evidence of them causing cellular harm, much less the kinds of shitty, long-term crippling or deadly effects that we clinically know are caused by the chemicals and elements humans have spent centuries casually contaminating themselves with.