4 ms·
> The actual distribution is not free, management companies take a huge cut both formally or informally. Spotify has a list of recommended distributors [1]. Th
by bhelkey 2y ago
> The actual distribution is not free, management companies take a huge cut both formally or informally.
Spotify has a list of recommended distributors [1]. The first one on the list, DistroKid, charges $22/yr for unlimited uploads to Spotify, Apple Music with the artist keeping all royalties[2].
$22 is not free but is very reasonable.
[1] https://support.spotify.com/us/artists/article/getting-music-on-spotify/ https://support.spotify.com/us/artists/article/getting-music...
[2] https://distrokid.com/ https://distrokid.com/
- kmeisthax 2y agoYouTube is chock full of musicians with endless complaints about DistroKid's practices and policies: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x14kZTPA064 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x14kZTPA064 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AuE3YQK1-Ng https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AuE3YQK1-Ng https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=itYB2XSsLAc https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=itYB2XSsLAc
- bongodongobob 2y agoWell they're off base because it's nearly free global distribution. Cry me a river or be so talented the entire world wants to pay you to perform live. No one pays to see mediocrity.
- aziaziazi 2y agoI appreciate the links, would you share the complaints here? I access the web with 8yo phone or 11yo laptop and HN is great because it’s text only and does not require to arbitrage between loading speed and buying a new device each X year.
- potatoman22 2y agoSpotify is essentially the distributor now, not DistroKid.