3 ms·

Does anyone here still believe in #1 though? I mean, AI is a nice development. But the hype started by ChatGPT doesn't really carry over to all aspects of the

Does anyone here still believe in #1 though? I mean, AI is a nice development. But the hype started by ChatGPT doesn't really carry over to all aspects of the industry as much as it's said to. It's really good at some things, and really sucks at some others even though it pretends to do them. It's "Gold" for the things it's good at. It's a bubble waiting to burst for the others. PS: I wouldn't consider intel obsolete. Imagine they stopped making their CPUs and chipsets tomorrow. Society would be really really screwed. Sure there's AMD but they can't handle all that. They're managing things more traditionally, sure. But they're also in a much more settled market.

frognumber 2y ago
I have no idea about the future progression of AI, and anyone who claims they do is either lying to you or to themselves. I'll also mention: - ChatGPT was a lot smarter for the types of things I'd like to use it for before the "safety" work. The efforts to make it never say anything offensive also made it a lot dumber. I saw a paper to that effect too. Perhaps some of that was a result of optimizations to shrink the model and make it more efficient (but then I'd expect GPT-4 to be smarter). - GPT3, which was an autocomplete, could do some things well the modern chatbot-ified models can't. - I have a lot of practice making the models smarter by having them check their own work, vote, etc. I have no idea how high the ceiling is. I might be a few inches away, or it might be the sky. That's a good time to hedge. Probably "legacy" was a better word than "obsolete." My language was sloppy.