> Lets say that somehow this requirement ( 'reasonable playable state' ) was mandated. It would likely result in more modular architecture. I call that a win.

> Lets say that somehow this requirement ( 'reasonable playable state' ) was mandated. It would likely result in more modular architecture. I call that a win. It would also raise the cost of development, and raise the barrier of entry into markets. Again, I am not against this proposal quite the opposite. But it should be made clear very early on what "reasonable playable state" means, and ideally in a way that would not constitute a huge competitive disadvantage for smaller developers.