I did read the article. At least the 3 paragraphs the web server chose to show to my user agent. I believe my statement is consistent with these 3 paragraphs. T

I did read the article. At least the 3 paragraphs the web server chose to show to my user agent. I believe my statement is consistent with these 3 paragraphs. There is no information about how accessing public media from a public server and doing some computation on it is illegal under copyright as it is currently. Many cases by authors have already been thrown out re: training of non-book LLM on book contents. Indeed, if we take the US government's established behavior re: computer analysis, it doesn't even count as looking at something (like NSA spy records) unless a human looks at it. Computers can compute however much they want on data. It only matters when humans are shown the otherwise illegally gathered (or copyrighted) data directly. If there are more than 3 paragraphs for your user agent perhaps you can scrape it and post it here as a reply.