3 ms·
This is just their response to a legal challenge. If we're asking rhetorical questions, then "why wouldn't CrowdStrike's lawyers try to defer responsibility and
by dmix 2y ago
This is just their response to a legal challenge. If we're asking rhetorical questions, then "why wouldn't CrowdStrike's lawyers try to defer responsibility and not pay millions of dollars?". Otherwise it's reading a bit too much into it and the courts will sort it out.
> CrowdStrike said Sunday that its liability is contractually capped at an amount in the “single-digit millions.”
That's probably a key question too^
- zo1 2y agoIsn't there a legal/lawyer equivalent to saying the wrong thing to cops. E.g. If you as a person lie or mislead during questioning and that adds weight to your being guilty during trial. So lawyers trying to pawn this off and use stupid legalese to shift blame, make or ask time-wasting accusations etc. I'm not a lawyer or versed in all the legal stuff, but something smells like a double standard here.