> That's incorrect, there's a use of the nullptr No, there isn't. > declared unsafe Please, I have no patience for the purposefully obtuse. It's clear I was

> That's incorrect, there's a use of the nullptr No, there isn't. > declared unsafe Please, I have no patience for the purposefully obtuse. It's clear I was referring to other languages there. Which, you failed to address. Probably because it was difficult, so you figured if you just said "I'm right" and elaborated nothing nobody would notice. Sorry, that doesn't work on people who are awake. As I've said, you can argue that C++ is weakly typed but you MUST also address languages like C# and Java to make that argument. You haven't, so nobody will believe you when you say C++ is weakly typed.