4 ms·
No, I understand that replication is the double cost. I meant cloud solution should not have storage failures which causes data loss.
by akhkharu 14y ago
No, I understand that replication is the double cost.
I meant cloud solution should not have storage failures which causes data loss.
- kiallmacinnes 14y agoI disagree. Amazon simply gave you the choice over what level of reliability you require. Would you have preferred they only offered Multi-AZ databases? (and in the process doubled your development, staging and QA environment costs..)
- nevinera 14y agoAnd google should give us all ponies. Would you mind defending your expectation that other people and companies will give you extra services for free? Amazon has been very clear on the expected failure rate of ebs volumes and the attendant rds failures. If you want data safety, multi-az deployment offers it.