3 ms·
I do not like this line of argumentation even though I think it would likely generate the result I want in this instance. You mentioned seatbelts and airbags, b
by A4ET8a8uTh0 2y ago
I do not like this line of argumentation even though I think it would likely generate the result I want in this instance. You mentioned seatbelts and airbags, but that train keeps on pushing and now we have calls for mandated kill switch[1] and automatically limit car speed[2]. It is so easy to keep pushing, because who would argue against safety.
The funny thing is, I agree with you, but in a narrow scope. I am adult. I can and do make decisions that are not fun long term, but could be considered stances on issues ( Doom whatever refund after DRM update ). I am not entirely certain 13-year old demographic playing current crop of always on games have the same perspective. There is a reason we try to protect kids from predatory behavior. They tend to not know any better.
But then, it unfortunately starts being about parents not doing their jobs.
<< People shouldn't be punished for being imperfect and businesses shouldn't be able to weaponize human psychology to take advantage of people.
tldr, i agree in general, but i hesitate on specifics
[1]https://mccaul.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/mccaul-sponsors-bill-repeal-democrats-kill-switch-cars-mandate https://mccaul.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/mccaul-...
[2]https://www.politico.com/news/2024/04/24/california-car-speed-limit-00154155 https://www.politico.com/news/2024/04/24/california-car-spee...
- thereddaikon 2y agoYeah I'm not a nanny state advocate. Moderation in all things, there is good regulation and bad regulation.