3 ms·
This would be more realistic, and everyone can still understand it, so it is another good example. The point was to provide an extreme system to highlight the v
by nihzm 2y ago
This would be more realistic, and everyone can still understand it, so it is another good example. The point was to provide an extreme system to highlight the value of simplicity in the dynamics of trust in a voting system.
- 9dev 2y agoNo no, I got that. I wanted to highlight that part of the paper voting system in support of your argument, as I think democracy is a people business, and the paper system works by involving people at every step. If citizens are responsible for counting the ballots and watching the process, they also share responsibility for the trustworthiness of the system. By involving as many of them as possible, large-scale manipulation becomes nigh impossible.