> The Observer claimed that the removal of certain content was aimed at "protecting audiences from repeats of Edwards' most visible work in news and on state oc

> The Observer claimed that the removal of certain content was aimed at "protecting audiences from repeats of Edwards' most visible work in news and on state occasions", including the funeral of Queen Elizabeth II. What he did was abominable, but if you memory hole the news because of the person reading it, you're throwing the baby out with the bathwater.