4 ms·

What's interesting about this is, I have always done what the author describes and I just assumed when people wrote (for example) an essay, they would outline a

by idk1 2y ago

What's interesting about this is, I have always done what the author describes and I just assumed when people wrote (for example) an essay, they would outline all the points and the structure first and then go and fill in each section and refine it over time. Same with ideas and projects, I would do rough outlines, then add fidelity. Same with programing, I'll make an outline and go and refine it all. It's strange, I assumed this so strong I never thought anyone would ever start writing and essay from the beginning without considering more of it, similar to just starting projects or code, I guess they do and it works really well. What's the break down of people's approches to things here, which bucket are you in?

smu 2y ago
As a hobby project, I started a market research/overview of the Belgian cybersecurity ecosystem [1]. This required me to write a lot more than before, although I've always enjoyed writing. In the beginning, I wrote beginning -> end, with just a high outline in my mind. Now, I write bullets first and then expand into paragraphs. This has helped me write a lot quicker and I think the articles have become easier to read (which matters a lot online, where everyone reads diagonally). [1] https://becyberscape.com https://becyberscape.com
diggan 2y ago
> It's strange, I assumed this so strong I never thought anyone would ever start writing and essay from the beginning without considering more of it, similar to just starting projects or code, I guess they do and it works really well. It really depends on the task/text at hand. With some things I set out to do, I know I want to reach a concrete goal, then it's easy to do an outline first with the finish point being the known goal, then fill out the middle-pieces. But at other points, you're not 100% sure what the goal is. Then starting from the beginning and just going with the flow until you reach something that feels like the goal is the way to go, and you'll adjust as you go along. Other times a mix between the two is optimal, where you think you knew what the goal was, but as you're half-way of filling out the outline, you see that another goal would be better fitted, and you adjust. Or you realize what the goal was all-along as you're nearing the finish, and you go back and adjust. Basically, there is no single path/process that fits all types of problems or people even. You try out different things until you find the way(s) that fit you and the stuff you typically handle.
akudha 2y ago
I had a boss who was a very good programmer and a writer. He used to spend hours just writing the table of contents, hours. Once he is satisfied, he will finish writing the actual text very, very fast. While he would write and rewrite ToC multiple times, he rarely edited the actual content, no matter how long it was. I suppose different strategies work for different people

by idk1 2y ago

smu 2y ago

As a hobby project, I started a market research/overview of the Belgian cybersecurity ecosystem [1]. This required me to write a lot more than before, although I've always enjoyed writing. In the beginning, I wrote beginning -> end, with just a high outline in my mind. Now, I write bullets first and then expand into paragraphs. This has helped me write a lot quicker and I think the articles have become easier to read (which matters a lot online, where everyone reads diagonally). [1] https://becyberscape.com https://becyberscape.com

diggan 2y ago

> It's strange, I assumed this so strong I never thought anyone would ever start writing and essay from the beginning without considering more of it, similar to just starting projects or code, I guess they do and it works really well. It really depends on the task/text at hand. With some things I set out to do, I know I want to reach a concrete goal, then it's easy to do an outline first with the finish point being the known goal, then fill out the middle-pieces. But at other points, you're not 100% sure what the goal is. Then starting from the beginning and just going with the flow until you reach something that feels like the goal is the way to go, and you'll adjust as you go along. Other times a mix between the two is optimal, where you think you knew what the goal was, but as you're half-way of filling out the outline, you see that another goal would be better fitted, and you adjust. Or you realize what the goal was all-along as you're nearing the finish, and you go back and adjust. Basically, there is no single path/process that fits all types of problems or people even. You try out different things until you find the way(s) that fit you and the stuff you typically handle.

akudha 2y ago

I had a boss who was a very good programmer and a writer. He used to spend hours just writing the table of contents, hours. Once he is satisfied, he will finish writing the actual text very, very fast. While he would write and rewrite ToC multiple times, he rarely edited the actual content, no matter how long it was. I suppose different strategies work for different people