TL;DR, and this took a while to parse out, but the post suggests a highly unlikely event that the vote was accurate. > The numerical anomaly is that if one mu

TL;DR, and this took a while to parse out, but the post suggests a highly unlikely event that the vote was accurate. > The numerical anomaly is that if one multiplies the total number of voters {10,058,774} by the round percentages {51.2\%}, {44.2\%}, {4.6\%}, one recovers exactly the above vote counts after rounding to the nearest integer: ... > giving credence to the theory of the election report being manipulated (though it is possible that the manipulation could occur through a third hypothesis {H_2} not covered by the original two hypotheses, such as a software glitch