4 ms·

>Why can't AI learn to do that? Because it isn't magic. >It could be trained on hundreds of GPU drivers Do you know what an AI trained on hundreds of books l

>Why can't AI learn to do that? Because it isn't magic. >It could be trained on hundreds of GPU drivers Do you know what an AI trained on hundreds of books looks like? Even with millions of books it can not write a coherent chapter, much less an entire book. This is a genuinely terrible idea. It is exactly the thing AI is bad at, high degree of accuracy over long stretches of output.

gosub100 2y ago
> Because it isn't magic. So graphics drivers are magic? They weren't designed in a determinate way, with a known interface and specifications?
- constantcrying 2y ago
  No, AI isn't magic. LLMs are bad at exactly those things which you need to make a GPU driver. Extremely high accuracy over long distances. AI totally falls apart when trying to write a novel, how could it write a GPU driver?
  - gosub100 2y ago
    They are excellent at stealing artists' content. I don't think it will be long for them to steal content from authors.
    - constantcrying 2y ago
      They just are terrible at producing long coherent segments of text. >They are excellent at stealing artists' content. AI doesn't "steal" anything. It is matrix multiplication. AI companies are exercising fair use to create derived works using matrix multiplication. Not only is it obviously fair use, it is also what every other artist does. >I don't think it will be long for them to steal content from authors. Most authors who have digitally available works have almost certainly have had their works used as training data.
      - gosub100 2y ago
        there's literally no such thing as theft. only bring an object to one location from another, all 3d planes are relative to earth/sun/galaxy's orbit. there is no such thing as location.
        constantcrying 2y ago
        AI is just doing the exact same thing all artists are doing. By your logic every artist who has ever viewed another artists image are thieves. Also intellectual property isn't real. Copy right needs to be abolished. Most artists are terrible and should be replaced by AI.

gosub100 2y ago

> Because it isn't magic. So graphics drivers are magic? They weren't designed in a determinate way, with a known interface and specifications?

constantcrying 2y ago
No, AI isn't magic. LLMs are bad at exactly those things which you need to make a GPU driver. Extremely high accuracy over long distances. AI totally falls apart when trying to write a novel, how could it write a GPU driver?
- gosub100 2y ago
  They are excellent at stealing artists' content. I don't think it will be long for them to steal content from authors.
  - constantcrying 2y ago
    They just are terrible at producing long coherent segments of text. >They are excellent at stealing artists' content. AI doesn't "steal" anything. It is matrix multiplication. AI companies are exercising fair use to create derived works using matrix multiplication. Not only is it obviously fair use, it is also what every other artist does. >I don't think it will be long for them to steal content from authors. Most authors who have digitally available works have almost certainly have had their works used as training data.
    - gosub100 2y ago
      there's literally no such thing as theft. only bring an object to one location from another, all 3d planes are relative to earth/sun/galaxy's orbit. there is no such thing as location.
      - constantcrying 2y ago
        AI is just doing the exact same thing all artists are doing. By your logic every artist who has ever viewed another artists image are thieves. Also intellectual property isn't real. Copy right needs to be abolished. Most artists are terrible and should be replaced by AI.