3 ms·
Nonetheless, no city is responsible for providing pleasant housing for everyone who comes there. The law on that is now quite clear.
by UIUC_06 2y ago
Nonetheless, no city is responsible for providing pleasant housing for everyone who comes there. The law on that is now quite clear.
- hobs 2y agoIf you cant offer something better than jail why stay out of jail?
- Cupertino95014 2y agoSo you're saying "let's put them in jail?"
- maerF0x0 2y ago>"than jail why stay out of jail? to me their sentence reads more like if the shelter is worse than prison, might as well do something to get into prison.
- drblastoff 2y agoThe point is that you don’t incentivize moving to SF with no money and no job and no prospects and living on the street until you get free housing. Newsom tried this while he was mayor. His conclusion was that for every person they put in housing, two new people showed up on the street. Another issue was that most people they put into “temporary” supportive housing never moved out. A significant portion of SF’s budget goes towards paying for the housing of formerly homeless people. The city won’t put them out on the street, so why would they ever leave?
- literallycancer 2y agoCan't blame people for not using shelters if you make them feel like a prison. Would you use a shelter where you can't control light switches, get woken up by a siren, get your stuff stolen, probably have to share showers and kitchen with junkies, if you are even allowed to cook your own food?
- UIUC_06 2y agohttps://svdp-sf.org/what-we-do/msc-shelter/ https://svdp-sf.org/what-we-do/msc-shelter/ For most of those, I either don't find any support, or it's actually contradicted ("get your stuff stolen"). "cook your own food" -- how do they manage that if they live on the street? VDP does mention: "fully-functioning computer lab free weekly haircuts shower and laundry facilities" So I think you are mostly making stuff up.