3 ms·
Considering Iran issued a warning that Hezbollah (a direct proxy of the Iranian regime) would attack civilian targets in Israel and not military targets, it wou
by blackeyeblitzar 2y ago
Considering Iran issued a warning that Hezbollah (a direct proxy of the Iranian regime) would attack civilian targets in Israel and not military targets, it would be safe to assume that any allies of Israel and their citizens are also targets. Yet somehow whenever the government urges citizens to leave, someone ends up staying behind and gets in trouble.
- wahern 2y agoSome people always stay behind. You see the same patterns when you read about accounts of the Holocaust, Cambodian genocide, Rwandan genocide; unfathomable numbers of people stay put. Sometimes people have a good excuse, e.g. elderly or sickly. But often it's inexplicable. Maybe its personality traits that resist change (moving is more stressful for some than others, especially when unplanned), or resist accepting what others can clearly see as an inevitability. This pattern is so pervasive that any intelligent observer should question whether they would get up and leave under the same circumstances; clearly there are dynamics at play that aren't evident from the outside.
- The_Colonel 2y agoPeople often simply believe that they personally won't be affected. Which is statistically true, but it depends on personal risk tolerance and other factors you mentioned.
- dunekid 2y agoCitation(not interpretation)please? I don't think nobody could surpass Israel in the civilian casualty count. And in the hitting schools count, or in the hitting hospitals front. Not to mention the massive hostage taking from Gaza. And their abuse of those hostages at their military bases. And to top it all calling a United Nations agency a terrorist organisation. None could afford to do that.