5 ms·
> Yet ESDF is objectively better Subjectively better. If I were to switch to ESDF, I would have only one key to the right of my index finger in each row, as o
by foresto 2y ago
> Yet ESDF is objectively better
Subjectively better.
If I were to switch to ESDF, I would have only one key to the right of my index finger in each row, as opposed to two. (I have a split keyboard.) You could argue that I would have two keys to the left of my pinky finger, but I find that reach more difficult.
I would also have a harder time orienting my fingers without looking, because I would no longer have the differently-shaped keys under my pinky to let me know I was in the right place. (The indentation that indicates home position on my F key is subtle, and easy to miss when I'm focused on the action in a game.)
- admax88qqq 2y agoObjectively better on a standard non split keyboard then. Many games assume non split keyboard for default key bindings
- bigstrat2003 2y agoNo, still subjectively better. There's no such thing as objectively better when it comes to control schemes. It's all personal preference.
- foresto 2y agoWhat is a "standard" non-split keyboard? What do a game developer's assumptions have to do with objectivity? Also, you have conveniently ignored my last paragraph. The better mapping is objectively subjective. ;)
- nailer 2y agoIt is a keyboard that is not split.