3 ms·
What are some changes that we could make that would discourage it?
by dividefuel 2y ago
What are some changes that we could make that would discourage it?
- AnotherGoodName 2y agoThe political donation system is a good place to start. There’s no way to read corporate donations to lobby groups as anything other than bribery for favourable laws. Why even run a good business when you can just get handouts.
- dmvdoug 2y agoGood luck amending the First Amendment.
- Jensson 2y agoFirst amendment doesn't say that money is speech, sending politicians money shouldn't be protected by the first amendment. Politicians likes to receive money though so of course they say money is speech. I wonder when they say that bribing politicians is speech as well so there can't be laws against direct bribes.
- dmvdoug 2y agoI agree, the Supreme Court got it wildly wrong when they said donating money by itself is speech. It isn’t. But here we are. The only way at this point to change it is to pack the Court or amend the Constitution. And I would even bet that a majority of people agree with you and me on this, but an explicit amendment to get rid of an asinine interpretation would get tribalized instantly into an attack on America (“CHANGE THE FIRST AMENDMENT?! WHY DO YOU HATE AMERICA”). I’m dead certain that would be the play. Rather than seeing that it’s how the system is supposed to work. (Think of the Chisholm v. Georgia ruling and the 11th Amendment. Yes, it is the province and duty of the judiciary to say what the law is. And when enough of us are like, you know what, no, we have mechanisms built in to enable us to win. Popular sovereignty, baby. Except… That’s one of those really great ideas that once it makes contact with the real world, is beautifully theoretical and hopelessly naive.)