Worse, the author completely gets the fundamental precept wrong by claiming "superhuman means human, but more so" when in fact it means "above human." So the w

Worse, the author completely gets the fundamental precept wrong by claiming "superhuman means human, but more so" when in fact it means "above human." So the whole article is just barking up the wrong tree. The real reason the better-at-problemsolving machines aren't coming to destroy everything that is dear to you is because they don't exist and we're not close to making them, but this article misses that basic truth in the pursuit of a misunderstanding of the prefix "super".