3 ms·
I don't really expect something in Wikipedia to get into the nuances of particular dish quality. But, in general, I would expect that--to the degree Wikipedia g
by ghaff 2y ago
I don't really expect something in Wikipedia to get into the nuances of particular dish quality. But, in general, I would expect that--to the degree Wikipedia gets into the quality of a particular restaurant--a New York Times review would carry a lot of weight. In general though I agree that Wikipedia is probably not the place for restaurant reviews even to the degree they're sources from well-known restaurant critics.
- kragen 2y agothis is generally limited to things that wikipedia editors of vastly opposing viewpoints can agree on, like whether and when the restaurant was awarded a michelin star like, imagine a vegan, a devout hindu, a muslim, a carnivore, a neighborhood kid, and a foodie editing an article about a texas steakhouse that is known for its barbecued pork. whatever text any of these people finds unfairly biased is going to get deleted from the article, and what's left is what they can agree on this process produces astoundingly reliable articles on contentious topics like the armenian genocide, but the results are predictably of poor literary quality, and generally not very useful for things like guessing which restaurant you would prefer to eat at