13 ms·
Should have kept the dividend at a small, but non-zero value for psychological reasons.
by RicoElectrico 2y ago
Should have kept the dividend at a small, but non-zero value for psychological reasons.
- melling 2y agoI’m fine losing the dividend. Fabs are expensive.
- whatever1 2y agoThey are laying off 15,000 people. The owners still want to see cash in their hands? I see examples like this and I am more convinced that equity holders must be taxed to death.
- specialist 2y agoRepeated radical cashectomies, until we restore gini coefficient of 0.35. 1970s USA. Maybe even go full Nordic and target 0.30.
- trashtensor 2y agoPeople would be too happy. We need them miserable and desperate.
- srackey 2y agoHacker News commenters not being communist challenge (IMPOSSIBLE) Serious though, fuck off
- whatever1 2y agoWe have plenty historical examples of where extreme inequalities can lead to, and it does not look good for the elites. So take the HN advice it's for your own good too.