3 ms·

I completely understand why someone would want to believe in that, what I don't understand is how they're capable of doing so given the complete lack of any con

I completely understand why someone would want to believe in that, what I don't understand is how they're capable of doing so given the complete lack of any contact with that "Someone". My parents wanted me to be Catholic like them though I told them I didn't believe in it when I was seven years old because god never appeared to me or answered a prayer or anything. I tried to believe for around a decade, but it never happened. I'd still like to, but I don't think it'll happen at this point.

za3faran 2y ago
Did you investigate how different religions provide their evidences and how they prove themselves?
- silverquiet 2y ago
  The best method seems to be holy texts from so long ago that the origins are hazy at best. It’s one reason it’s hard to believe that Mormonism took off so well; Joseph Smith’s personal foibles are still well recorded.
  - AnimalMuppet 2y ago
    For baseline Christianity (not Mormonism), there are a number of works giving a defense of the holy texts as being historically accurate. "Evidence That Demands A Verdict" by Josh McDowell was a good one, but it is almost certainly out of date by now. "Cold Case Christianity" by J. Warner Wallace is a more recent one, but is far less comprehensive. From a philosophical perspective, "He Is There And He Is Not Silent" by Francis Schaeffer is solid. It's simple, but very deep.
    - silverquiet 2y ago
      Historically they may track somewhat with the evidence, but I’ve seen no signs of the god or miracles they claim existed in that time.
  - lcall 2y ago
    Joseph Smith never claimed to be perfect, and notably said he was not, but that "there is no error in the revelations." I have learned for myself that the Book of Mormon is true (and amazing), and so can anyone who wants to test it for themselves. (More at my web site--in profile, nothing for sale, no stylistic ambition.) (Smith's life is thoroughly, unflinchingly documented: https://www.josephsmithpapers.org/ https://www.josephsmithpapers.org/ ). (Thoughtful comments appreciated with any downvotes.)

za3faran 2y ago

Did you investigate how different religions provide their evidences and how they prove themselves?

silverquiet 2y ago
The best method seems to be holy texts from so long ago that the origins are hazy at best. It’s one reason it’s hard to believe that Mormonism took off so well; Joseph Smith’s personal foibles are still well recorded.
- AnimalMuppet 2y ago
  For baseline Christianity (not Mormonism), there are a number of works giving a defense of the holy texts as being historically accurate. "Evidence That Demands A Verdict" by Josh McDowell was a good one, but it is almost certainly out of date by now. "Cold Case Christianity" by J. Warner Wallace is a more recent one, but is far less comprehensive. From a philosophical perspective, "He Is There And He Is Not Silent" by Francis Schaeffer is solid. It's simple, but very deep.
  - silverquiet 2y ago
    Historically they may track somewhat with the evidence, but I’ve seen no signs of the god or miracles they claim existed in that time.
- lcall 2y ago
  Joseph Smith never claimed to be perfect, and notably said he was not, but that "there is no error in the revelations." I have learned for myself that the Book of Mormon is true (and amazing), and so can anyone who wants to test it for themselves. (More at my web site--in profile, nothing for sale, no stylistic ambition.) (Smith's life is thoroughly, unflinchingly documented: https://www.josephsmithpapers.org/ https://www.josephsmithpapers.org/ ). (Thoughtful comments appreciated with any downvotes.)