3 ms·
if someone is misbehaving (and is aware of the system), I would imagine with a certain discipline (say, rotate the keyboard 180degrees and try to touch-type, or
by shabble 14y ago
if someone is misbehaving (and is aware of the system), I would imagine with a certain discipline (say, rotate the keyboard 180degrees and try to touch-type, or just hunt-n-peck with some significant random variation) it would be reasonably easy to 'fool'. That is, it would be unable to classify it as any of the known users.
I'd think it could be more robust than the 'remember to set env X=y before doing stuff' especially for real-time oh shit fix everything moments, as a sort of passive identification, but couldn't hope to stand against a determined adversary.
- ChuckMcM 14y agoI suspect you are right, however note that the proponents of this technology often claim that they can tell who you are even if you do these sorts of things.
- deleted 14y ago[deleted]
- dwerthen 14y agoIsn't the point that it would be rather difficult to impersonate someone else? I mean, the system would realize that "someone" is misbehaving and can flag/log the actions appropriately or even disallow them entirely.