TL;DR: How much of this is a potential class-action[1] and how much of this is failure to deliver on AI? Am I missing something? On one hand, I think I get it:

TL;DR: How much of this is a potential class-action[1] and how much of this is failure to deliver on AI? Am I missing something? On one hand, I think I get it: Intel hasn't been a GPU company historically. On the other, this quotes seems suspicious given Intel's gen 13 and 14 cores have issues: > Simply put, we must align our cost structure with our new operating model and fundamentally change the way we operate At the same time, my understanding is AMD seems ahead[2] of Intel in AI / CUDA support. This quote seems to be a nod to that without saying much else: > Our revenues have not grown as expected — and we’ve yet to fully benefit from powerful trends, like AI. Our costs are too high, our margins are too low. Before anyone point oout "Intel® Extension for Pytorch*" exists[3]: 1. That seems to be the official name (what?) 2. Their installation homepage seems a little convoluted[4] [1]: https://www.pcmag.com/news/intel-faces-potential-class-action-lawsuit-over-chip-bug-controversy https://www.pcmag.com/news/intel-faces-potential-class-actio... [2]: https://github.com/vosen/ZLUDA https://github.com/vosen/ZLUDA [3]: https://intel.github.io/intel-extension-for-pytorch/xpu/latest/index.html https://intel.github.io/intel-extension-for-pytorch/xpu/late... [4]: https://intel.github.io/intel-extension-for-pytorch/xpu/latest/tutorials/installation.html https://intel.github.io/intel-extension-for-pytorch/xpu/late...