>But when it is a famous result like this, you actually want it to fail so people talk about your result. There are finite resources for replication and so tho

>But when it is a famous result like this, you actually want it to fail so people talk about your result. There are finite resources for replication and so those resources must be allocated. High-profile results tend to attract good and skeptical replication attempts. This has always seemed like a pretty good approach to me. But replication takes time, and some people think it's a catastrophe that "bad" results don't immediately get corrected.