> There is, as of yet, no scientific justification for thinking that humans are different from computers in some fundamental physical sense This is similar to

> There is, as of yet, no scientific justification for thinking that humans are different from computers in some fundamental physical sense This is similar to the question of, can we simulate a brain? Even if we can't build one using a LLM-type construct, it seems at the very least we could model atomic interactions in detail and brute-force a simulation that way. However I think this requires that there is a lower limit to the level of detail of physical reality; otherwise the non-determinism such as what you see with the uncertainty principle becomes intractable. As a result it's not clear to me at all that humans are not different from computers in a physical sense.