> Given how much we see these 'general' systems in political propaganda (think of all the Twitter far right propaganda unmasked by users replying with 'ignore p

> Given how much we see these 'general' systems in political propaganda (think of all the Twitter far right propaganda unmasked by users replying with 'ignore previous instructions') I'm not sure I agree that these models do not fall under the high risk label. IMO, political propaganda is still low-risk; it simply means that citizens are panzying around and believing anything that pops in their feeds, and the correct counter-measure is to ban or regulate social media or to find a mechanism to encourage citizens to make better judgements (say, a tax deduction after passing a maths and modelling exam, a check for number of well-researched books read, or anything better than my 20-seconds-of-consideration rant). I also like the current classification, but I hope that as AI's get better and more dangerous, our regulations will evolve accordingly.