4 ms·
I think they should expand the scope to direct contribution for easy issues (right now Oscar seems mostly for surfacing project information to contributors), I'
by seveibar 2y ago
I think they should expand the scope to direct contribution for easy issues (right now Oscar seems mostly for surfacing project information to contributors), I've had a lot of luck using aider + sonnet for direct contribution, and I'm pretty sure you could do it at scale for "getting-started" issues.
[1] Github bot that does direct contributions https://github.com/tscircuit/bunaider https://github.com/tscircuit/bunaider
[2] Example contribution https://github.com/tscircuit/checks/pull/8 https://github.com/tscircuit/checks/pull/8
- jclulow 2y agoDear god I want off Mr Bone's Wild Ride. I can't wait for even more pull request spam, now fully automated.
- matheusmoreira 2y agoThe ride never ends.
- jamilton 2y agoI think it's good that they're focusing on all the not-code parts of contributing, as you say there are other projects for code contributions.
- codelion 2y agoWe also tried to implement a GH Issue to PR workflow in patchwork - https://github.com/patched-codes/patchwork https://github.com/patched-codes/patchwork It is a bit hard to get it to work reliably except for small changes.
- keybored 2y ago> > Oscar differs from many development-focused uses of LLMs by not trying to augment or displace the code writing process at all. After all, writing code is the fun part of writing software.