Maybe this is just me, and is taking things too far... but it would seem that perhaps, just perhaps, we should consider de-barring lawyers who make too many fri

Maybe this is just me, and is taking things too far... but it would seem that perhaps, just perhaps, we should consider de-barring lawyers who make too many frivolous claims against others and fail in court? Currently, it takes you getting to a Jack Thompson level to get booted from being able to sue and threaten others. The net effect of this is that fewer lawyers would be willing to take on frivolous claims and there would be less litigation overall. Of course this would only apply to plaintiffs, as everyone needs to be able to defend themselves against as many claims as needed.