A) that's absolutely not true, for instance we have archeological evidence of plants drastically altering the global temperature. For some reason the same solut

A) that's absolutely not true, for instance we have archeological evidence of plants drastically altering the global temperature. For some reason the same solution is viewed as naive today with no clear explanation. B) presumably any such smell would imply extreme skepticism—same as any empiricist presented with a model. There's zero skepticism as presented by this article, which leads me to think this dude is either insane or a shill for moneyed interests.