4 ms·
> You're still not making any sense. OK, how about this: IF you take a stool sample, the results are just as informative as a blood test. That's what they said
by AlbertCory 2y ago
> You're still not making any sense.
OK, how about this: IF you take a stool sample, the results are just as informative as a blood test. That's what they said. So it's up to the patient.
Obviously not doing anything cannot be better. Your second sentence is the one that makes no sense.
- shiroiushi 2y agoDid you not read the exchange before? Yes, not doing anything at all IS better, because they can get a blood sample from the blood they're ALREADY drawing from you. So, you have two choices: 1) do a blood draw AND a stool sample, or 2) do a blood draw only. Which one do you think is less work for the patient and the provider? #2 involves absolutely no extra work for the patient. Is this really that hard for you to understand?
- AlbertCory 2y agoMaybe you can drop the insults, so we can take you seriously. Or else just go away. Why do you even care?
- shiroiushi 2y agoIf you can't understand simple English and basic logic, then I can't help you. There's no insult in my prior message; you just seem to be completely unwilling or unable to understand a simple concept.