2 ms·
The answer is simple: security. Attacker needs a way into the machine to control it. Granted, there are some obscure vectors of attack that don't need network c
by bornfreddy 2y ago
The answer is simple: security. Attacker needs a way into the machine to control it. Granted, there are some obscure vectors of attack that don't need network connectivity (Stuxnet), however the game becomes much harder for the attacker when they have no direct connection to the target system.
Many countries solve this by having a separate network for hospitals, but it is not the only way.
In general, it is a trade-off between security and convenience. Yes, you can't send an e-mail without an Internet connection (well... not easily). But do you need to? From the computer that controls the MRI machine? Or is it just easier to say "we need Internet because updates"?
- kwhitefoot 2y ago>you can't send an e-mail without an Internet connection Of course you can.
- bornfreddy 2y agoTo an external recepient? And you misquoted me by removing end of the sentence in parenthesis.
- averageRoyalty 2y agoOf course. You send your email to an internal MTA that relays it (it likely has internet access). Segregation of access from terminals is a good thing, why would you want the terminal to be able to relay to an internet MTA itself?
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]