5 ms·
I'm not familiar. What am I missing?
by mtmail 2y ago
I'm not familiar. What am I missing?
- koolba 2y agoThey perform audits of crypto projects. The idea is that you’re certifying that the code is not going to immediately steal people’s money. Quite a few of their clients have gone on to do that with relatively simple vulnerabilities. To the point where “certik audit” is a meme about not providing any actual assurances (and thus implying they are incompetent). There also was the story a month or two ago where they actually took funds from a bug bounty target and eventually did give it back: https://blockworks.co/news/krakens-cso-confirms-certik-returned-funds-with-a-small-amount-lost-to-fees https://blockworks.co/news/krakens-cso-confirms-certik-retur...
- gnfargbl 2y agoThat's just the classic attack/defence asymmetry though, no? When playing defence you have to find every reachable vulnerability. When playing attack, you have to find one.
- londons_explore 2y agoIt highlights the fact that even experts can't find every bug in code, and therefore you probably shouldn't be using code as the only security for a monetary system.
- user90131313 2y agoThey are %100 corrupted people and stealers.That story a month ago is mind blowing. Black hat type
- oersted 2y agoI know this is rather obvious and has been repeated to death but: There's just absolutely no point to crypto if you end up having to trust institutions that are fundamentally less trustworthy than mainstream financial institutions and regulators, even if they have plenty of issues too.
- npoc 2y agoAbsolutely correct regarding cRypTo. But there's also bitcoin, which people wrongly group with it. They are two completely different things, once you dig a bit deeper. One is going to improve the world immeasurably - in fact one of mankind's most important (maybe greatest) inventions, and the other is a snake pit. If what I say sounds crazy, it won't after you've studied the topic for 5000 hours.
- netsharc 2y agoIt's so funny when crypto banks get robbed and they turn to the FBI to ask them to get the robbers...
- kybernetikos 2y agoI see no problem with this. Crime doesn't stop being crime just because its happening to virtual assets. Maybe some crypto folks want to disconnect from the rest of society, but I don't think that's very many of them.
- FireBeyond 2y agoMany folks said the Silk Road had made drug dealing "harmless". What they really meant was "harmless to me". Because it does nothing for anyone else in the chain to make it safer. There's also a non-zero sum of crypto proponents that think a large swathe of things that are illegal "IRL", should be non-criminal because ... "online".
- jenadine 2y agoThere are people who think some things that are illegal shouldn't be illegal. (Online or IRL doesn't matter)
- Suppafly 2y ago>Crime doesn't stop being crime just because its happening to virtual assets. Sure, but there is a reason that real banks have tons of laws and regulations. It's more or less not a crime to steal crypto because it's not a thing that's protected by law. And crypto bros are doing everything they can to keep it from being protected by law while whining that the law isn't able to help them.
- montenegrohugo 2y agoCertik has a terrible rep in the crypto ecosystem They're ostensibly an audit/security firm, but miss many vulns Most egregiously recently they tried to blackmail Kraken, a big exchange, for $2m
- frankjr 2y agoWell, "certik" does translate to "little devil"...
- user90131313 2y agooh so the founders already had the idea. so no surprise at all
- oersted 2y agoYes I believe the direct translation is simply "imp".
- qqqult 2y agoCrypto security audit company that used to be decent & somewhat respected then scaled out and hired many more security auditors with questionable skills and morals (such as exploiting bugs in projects they're paid to review & help). The running joke is that protocols with no security audits are safer than protocols with security audits done by CertiK.