4 ms·
I tend to agree. If you asked about a feature which uses some kind of ML under the hood to deliver that feature you'd different results. I think companies shoul
by afarviral 2y ago
I tend to agree. If you asked about a feature which uses some kind of ML under the hood to deliver that feature you'd different results. I think companies should urgently pull back on mentioning AI at all if they want any credibility at this point.
- viraptor 2y agoYup. "do you like that you can search for a name in your photo album" will get different answers then asking about AI.
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]
- ksaj 2y agoThat is a problem with Facebook, where people can tag you in images, even if you don't notice or approve it (you can opt out, but that's the opposite of what is optimal). Funny to see that come up again, but in a different context.
- viraptor 2y agoThere's lots of different implementations. For example Immich (https://immich.app/ https://immich.app/) is fully self-hosted and does local recognition. It doesn't have to be an online service stealing your data.
- rsynnott 2y agoThat was never previously marketed as 'AI', though (I suspect because when CV started seeing this sort of application, the memory of the _previous_ AI winter was still fairly fresh, so everyone carefully avoided the term). In marketing, 'AI' tends to mean _generative_ AI these days.