3 ms·
> There is a cost to having on-call. Whether it's in the extra hours you are paying your engineers or other technicians, or sleep deprivation, dwindling motivat
by chipdart 2y ago
> There is a cost to having on-call. Whether it's in the extra hours you are paying your engineers or other technicians, or sleep deprivation, dwindling motivation and performance, the cost is always there.
I don't understand your take. Every single time I had a job with an oncall rotation, that oncall was paid. I was paid a bonus for being oncall, I was paid a bonus if during oncalls a pager fired outside of office hours, I was paid a bonus if I was pulled into an incident response outside of my oncall rotation. There was always a cost, and we were paid for it. Being oncall represented loosely a pay bump of around 15%.
If that's not your case then I'm sorry but your problem is not the oncall rotation.
- pc86 2y agoGetting paid for on call, especially this tri-level multiple bonus structure, is incredibly uncommon.
- necovek 2y agoThat should make my point more obvious: why would a business pay you 15% more if they are losing minor or no money or customers if services are down until someone comes back for their regular work day?