Yes, if you only want a list, you can use the <OL> and <LI> commands of HTML and not much else should be needed. HTTP and HTML will still work, although not the

Yes, if you only want a list, you can use the <OL> and <LI> commands of HTML and not much else should be needed. HTTP and HTML will still work, although not the only possibility. I agree that self-hosting static content is a reasonable thing to do, and would be a good idea. However, reducing the number of files and file sizes still makes it more efficient, and so does using simpler server software (which is possible for HTTP, although it can be even more simpler with some other protocols if the server software is also simpler). > magnet: links have been around forever. I know about magnet: URI scheme, although mine is somewhat simpler (it is not intended to do everything that magnet: does), but also allows relative URLs (although supporting this involves things other than the usual URL format), and does not require URL encoding, and has some other differences. (Unlike the magnet: scheme, it is not intended to use with BitTorrent; it is intended for documents like other URI schemes are.) ("Forever" is a strong word; magnet: scheme was invented in 2002, according to Wikipedia.)