To the extent that is a First Amendment issue at all (which is debatable), I think it would be classified as a content-neutral time/place/manner restriction, wh

To the extent that is a First Amendment issue at all (which is debatable), I think it would be classified as a content-neutral time/place/manner restriction, which are frequently upheld: https://firstamendment.mtsu.edu/article/time-place-and-manner-restrictions/ https://firstamendment.mtsu.edu/article/time-place-and-manne... I don’t agree with this ULA decision, and I extra disagree with ULA’s apparent avoidance of public discussion of the reasons behind it. But I’d be very surprised if any court ruled against it