> Both individuals and companies would be held liable for producing, hosting or sharing unauthorized digital replicas, including ones made by generative AI. In

> Both individuals and companies would be held liable for producing, hosting or sharing unauthorized digital replicas, including ones made by generative AI. Interesting, so we're seeing new legislation that breaks from Section 230 precedent, in that providers can be held accountable for mischievous / nefarious actions of its users. > Exclusions are provided for recognized First Amendment protections, such as documentaries and biographical works, or for purposes of comment, criticism, or parody, among others. But parody and satire is still protected free speech in this case [0]! So by putting a "PARODY" label in the post, the creator of the Kamala Harris video [1] exempts themselves from the NO FAKES Act! [0] https://www.coons.senate.gov/news/press-releases/senators-coons-blackburn-klobuchar-tillis-introduce-bill-to-protect-individuals-voices-and-likenesses-from-ai-generated-replicas https://www.coons.senate.gov/news/press-releases/senators-co... [1] https://x.com/MrReaganUSA/status/1816826660089733492 https://x.com/MrReaganUSA/status/1816826660089733492