> the issue here is that the vote totals are very close to their 0.1% place roundings after multiplying the total votes times the percentages That's right, but

> the issue here is that the vote totals are very close to their 0.1% place roundings after multiplying the total votes times the percentages That's right, but the conclusion is a bit stronger than just "very close". There was no other integer that could have been closer, which is consistent with them rounding their fraudulent vote count up/down to the nearest integer.