3 ms·
>Why do you applaud it? Making money off of other peoples' work for nothing has never rubbed well with me. Much less if "other peoples' work" is American tax d
by Dalewyn 2y ago
>Why do you applaud it?
Making money off of other peoples' work for nothing has never rubbed well with me. Much less if "other peoples' work" is American tax dollars.
>If this were a change that wasn't a cash grab for ULA, would they not say so? Why the silence on the change?
Because they don't need to justify themselves. It's a proposal to which photographers so concerned can either sign off or walk away from, ULA is fine either way.
>They changed the terms of an arrangement without warning or explanation.
No, they did not. Whatever agreement they and the photographers had will be in force until whenever this new agreement succeeds. The photographers can choose to either sign it or walk away, they aren't being forced to sign anything.
- unethical_ban 2y agoI didn't downvote you since I'm part of the conversation. But of all the business practices and use of tax dollars to criticize, low-middle income photographers selling photos and doing marketing for the US space program is a really strange hill to fight on.