3 ms·
Suppose there was legitimacy to this, which many believe, why wouldn’t we still talk about this in 2024? Are we not allowed to discuss history?
by adamtaylor_13 2y ago
Suppose there was legitimacy to this, which many believe, why wouldn’t we still talk about this in 2024? Are we not allowed to discuss history?
- AnimalMuppet 2y agoBy 2024, most people should have figured out that there wasn't legitimacy to this.
- adamtaylor_13 2y agoWhy? What happened in 4 years that revealed to everyone beyond a doubt that it wasn’t legitimate? Where I live, no one questions that the election was rigged. Most believe it was. I haven’t done enough of my own research to know one way or the other.
- AnimalMuppet 2y agoLosing 60 out of 60 court cases that claimed election fraud should have been a data point. (Or 60 data points.)
- bloppe 2y agoThe key is that every single challenge has been debunked, often in court and often by Republican judges. When every challenge has been debunked, it's time to accept that the vote was fair. The problem is that it's too easy to hallucinate new challenges. It's easy to claim some guy stuffed ballot boxes with no evidence, and if people want to believe that, they will unless given irrefutable proof to the contrary. But how do you prove irrefutably that Fidel Castro definitely did not stuff all the ballot boxes? Apparently, you can't.
- bloppe 2y agoIt's a bit like discussing whether God exists. Ya lots of people believe it and you can certainly talk about it. But this isn't really a forum for that kind of conversation.