4 ms·
It's not quite so clear-cut. We even have a historical precedent here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Craigslist_Inc._v._3Taps_Inc https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki
by TheDong 2y ago
It's not quite so clear-cut. We even have a historical precedent here:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Craigslist_Inc._v._3Taps_Inc https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Craigslist_Inc._v._3Taps_Inc.
In that case, the court found 3Taps was criminally guilty for scraping publicly available craigslist data while logged out because 3Taps knew their use was not authorized.
This person has just received an email from Yelp telling them their free usage is not authorized, so circumventing that may well be illegal, now that they've been given that sort of communication, even if it might be questionably legal for other serpapi users.
- doh 2y agoThe courts are altering their views on scrapping. This [0] is a good paper that explored the last 20 years of rulings (although it hasn't been updated with the most recent cases). [0] https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3221625 https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3221625