Would it be fair to say then that "Python" is Turing complete, while CPython/PyPy implementations are not turing complete, because they will always implicitly r

Would it be fair to say then that "Python" is Turing complete, while CPython/PyPy implementations are not turing complete, because they will always implicitly run up against C's memory limitations, therefore they do have a hard limit. Python itself as a language is turing complete because it does not place realistic limitations on the user like C does?