3 ms·

Here's the site: https://aerospace.org/sites/default/files/styles/hero_small/public/2022-07/52187804215_e2ce1d1cbc_4k.jpg?itok=ee6FTD7J https://aerospace.org/s

• ceejayoz 2y ago
  It's hard for me to understand how the administrative issues could only apply to photographers who sell prints but not those who merely post to social. If you need to limit numbers, issue press passes to orgs and give a certain number of remaining slots away via lottery.
  • akira2501 2y ago
    > could only apply to photographers who sell prints but not those who merely post to social. They tend to be more aggressive. Their familiarity with the site lends them to act like they own it or that their presence is more justified than a mere casual. They camp out and grab spots or pre-register in a way the precludes other more casual participants from ever getting a pass. They create administrative burden where none might otherwise exist. > If you need to limit numbers I think they want to limit the behavior. This is a favor they are doing for interested parties. It's a shame that some people tend to ruin it. Perhaps I'm being _exceptionally_ charitable to ULA here, but in my experience with similar situations, I genuinely think that's what is occurring here. Which explains their reticence to speak on the issue and the for profit photographers clearly getting a puff piece written exclusively from their point of view.
    • ceejayoz 2y ago
      So we’ve moved on from space issues to road issues to another hypothesis. Is there any evidence for the behavior you now assert is happening?