3 ms·
>closure #2 closes over closure #1 I don't see this in the example. Closure #1 is never bound in the scope, as far as I can tell. Could you explain how closure
by Zacru 2y ago
>closure #2 closes over closure #1
I don't see this in the example. Closure #1 is never bound in the scope, as far as I can tell. Could you explain how closure #1 is closed over without being bound?