4 ms·
From a mobile OEM's perspective (excepting Apple and Samsung, who have the capability to produce their own SoCs), besides arch there's very little difference be
by ConstantineXVI 14y ago
From a mobile OEM's perspective (excepting Apple and Samsung, who have the capability to produce their own SoCs), besides arch there's very little difference between Intel and other SoC vendors. Snapdragon, Tegra, and OMAP all leave about as much room for customization as Medfield (the mobile Atom variant) does. Qualcomm actually goes a step further than most and packs the modem into the SoC itself. This is partially why you see so many international phones using a different SoC end up swapping for a Snapdragon in the US. Qualcomm was heavily involved in the LTE spec, ensuring they had a head start on modems vs. the rest. Thus when American carriers demand LTE (or DC-HSPA in T-Mobile's case), it's then easier for OEMs to use a Qualcomm part vs. wait on a competitor's part to be approved and be late to market.
- protomyth 14y agoSince Apple and Samsung are the majority of the market at this point, it makes a big difference. Beyond that, you have a number of vendors able to use ARM cores to make product. Never mind AMD getting using ARM cores. Intel has a chipset they want to sell everyone. The ARM ecosystem consists of multiple solutions from multiple vendors all with the core CPU software being the same.