3 ms·
This argument is limited to use of CCS to support fossil fuel use. Unrelated projects such as using algae to sequester atmospheric carbon as are being tried in
by m0llusk 2y ago
This argument is limited to use of CCS to support fossil fuel use. Unrelated projects such as using algae to sequester atmospheric carbon as are being tried in Israel and South Africa are showing great promise. It is unfortunate that oil industry critics are so fixated on their limited goals that they can't be bothered to take care with their language or pay attention to what else is going on.
- ghouse 2y agoThe algae, forest, and other capture projects do not appear to sequester, on a geologic time scale, the atmospheric carbon. Even the sequestering of carbon through enhanced oil recovery is of uncertain time scale.