6 ms·
Yes but Djot is pretty good though! Wouldn’t call it informal nor bug-ridden, it’s well thought out and doesn’t have many corner cases: https://djot.net/ https
by nequo 2y ago
Yes but Djot is pretty good though! Wouldn’t call it informal nor bug-ridden, it’s well thought out and doesn’t have many corner cases:
https://djot.net/ https://djot.net/
Designed by one of the authors of CommonMark, an attempt to specify a standardized flavor of Markdown.
- 0cf8612b2e1e 2y agoI just wish it would move along already. I get it, some tough calls need to be made on edge cases that do not have a correct answer. Yet I want a 1.0 release so I can feel confident that the language will have staying power. Then again, it is already in pandoc, so I suppose you can trivially move out of it.
- keybored 2y agoDjot insists that this nesting of bullet points is wrong: - first - second Instead you need this: - first - second I’m very picky about the aesthetics of lightweight MLs so this is tough to swallow. EDIT: By the way, recent comment from the primary developer: https://github.com/jgm/djot/discussions/310#discussioncomment-10182767 https://github.com/jgm/djot/discussions/310#discussioncommen...
- kps 2y agoNot having used djot myself, does “rethink tight/loose lists” refer to that?